Cases 41 - 50 of 85
Harris v. Mansfield State Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2014cv00715
Plaintiff:
Isaac Michael Harris
Defendant:
Mansfield State Correctional Institution, Unit Manager T. King, Vault Lt. Reece and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Mansfield State Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2014cv00260
Plaintiff:
Isaac Michael Harris
Defendant:
Mansfield State Correctional Institution, Unit Manager T. King, Vault Lt. Reece and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2014cv00173
Petitioner:
Michael Harris
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Milledge v. McNeil et al
as 3:2014cv00248
Plaintiff:
Corey Milledge
Defendant:
Walter McNeil, J.D. Reddish, Brad Whitehead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Hurley
as 4:2013cv02328
Petitioner:
Michael Harris
Respondent:
James Hurley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris #198341 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv01888
Petitioner:
Shaun Michael Harris
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. King et al
as 1:2013cv05404
Plaintiff:
Michael Harris
Defendant:
Freda King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Warden, Warren Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2013cv00510
Plaintiff:
Isaac Michael Harris
Defendant:
Warden, Warren Correctional Institution, Stagmier, Craft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Tibbals
as 1:2013cv01454
Petitioner:
Michael Harris
Respondent:
Terry Tibbals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Harris v. Partha Ghosh, et al
as 13-2250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
PARTHA GHOSH, Dr., in his individual capacity as Medical Director of SCC, MICHAEL P. RANDLE, SARAH JOHNSON, in her individual capacity as ARB Coordinator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
