Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 195
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12821
Plaintiff: MICHAEL HENRY BROWN
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RUDIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11716
Plaintiff: MICHAEL HENRY RUDIN
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hearn v. MTC
as 3:2022cv00470
Plaintiff: Michael Henry Hearn
Defendant: MTC
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hearn v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2022cv00469
Plaintiff: Michael Henry Hearn
Defendant: State of Mississippi
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HENRY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00727
Petitioner: MICHAEL HENRY
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Anderson v. Dayton
as 6:2022cv00047
Plaintiff: Michael Henry Anderson
Defendant: Ray J. Dayton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Burgess
as 2:2022cv11159
Petitioner: Joseph Michael Henry
Respondent: Michael Burgess
Henry v. USAA General Indemnity Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00587
Plaintiff: Michael Henry
Defendant: USAA General Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Henry v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv01091
Plaintiff: Michael Henry
Defendant: United States of America, Kwame Raoul, Illinois Attorney General, U.S. Attorney Gregory K. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Henry v. The State of Illinois et al
as 1:2022cv01090
Plaintiff: Michael Henry
Defendant: The State of Illinois, Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul, The United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?