Cases
WASHINGTON v. EVANS
as 2:2015cv04265
Plaintiff: SAMANTHA WASHINGTON
Defendant: MICHAEL J. EVANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00030
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Gunther v. C & A Transport, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00623
Plaintiff: Rosemarie Gunther
Defendant: C & A Transport, LLC and Michael J. Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv32301
Plaintiff: Virginia E. Evans and Michael J. Evans, Sr.
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. Garrett Auto Sales et al
as 2:2013cv00032
Plaintiff: Michael J Evans
Defendant: Garrett Auto Sales, Solomon Garrett, Eddie Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Teamster Allied Benefit Funds v. Blankfein et al
as 1:2010cv03614
Plaintiff: Teamster Allied Benefit Funds and Westchester Putnam Counties Heavy and Highway Laborers Local 60 Benefit Funds
Defendant: Lloyd C. Blankfein, Gary D. Cohn, David A. Viniar and others
Movant: Teamsters Allied Benefit Funds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clem v. Blankfein et al
as 1:2010cv03578
Plaintiff: James Clem
Petitioner: Teamsters Allied Benefit Funds
Defendant: Lloyd C. Blankfein, Gary D. Cohn, Michael S. Sherwood and others
Nominal Defendant: The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
Respondent: The Schrank Living Trust
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Hal Hubuschman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Evans et al v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02011
Plaintiff: Michael J. Evans and Elizabeth Evans
Defendant: Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?