Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Cunningham v. Loudoun County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Colette Cunningham
Defendant:
Loudoun County Sheriff's Office and Michael L. Chapman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Piland v. Capella et al
as 1:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
Richard R Piland, III
Defendant:
Robert Capella and Sheriff Michael L. Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ZAHIR v. HOGAN et al
as 3:2021cv00547
Plaintiff:
Naja Talibah Zahir
Defendant:
Lawrence Joseph Hogan, Jr., Governor of Virginia Ralph Northam, James Mountcastle and others
Trustee:
Queen Naja
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZAHIR v. HOGAN et al
as 2:2020cv06051
Defendant:
LAWRENCE JOSEPH HOGAN, JR., RALPH NORTHAM, THOMAS A MOOREHEAD and others
Plaintiff:
NAJA TALIBAH ZAHIR
Trustee:
QUEEN NAJA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Stacks, et al
as 1:2019cv00532
Defendant:
Mark Stacks, Michael L Chapman, Josiah Kennedy and others
Plaintiff:
Lee V Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fitzgerald v. Virginia Commonwealth et al
as 1:2018cv00758
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Virginia Commonwealth, Frank Buttery, Justin Michael Weineke and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
Almanza et al v. Brock et al
as 1:2018cv00607
Plaintiff:
Rolled Almanza and Laura Lizzet Almanza Miranda
Defendant:
Jillian Elizabeth Brock , Jeffry Dean Rima, Perry D. Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. Chapman
as 1:2017cv01488
Plaintiff:
Eric Araujo Flores
Defendant:
Michael L. Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
