Cases 61 - 70 of 85
Michael Lewis v. Chandler
as 13-10256
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL LEWIS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN CHANDLER
Lewis v. Warden Chandler
as 4:2013cv00053
Petitioner:
Michael Lewis
Respondent:
Warden Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
New Orleans Saints, L.L.C., et al v. Cam Cleeland, et al
as 12-30839
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NEW ORLEANS SAINTS, L.L.C. and NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE MANAGEMENT COUNCIL
Defendant - Appellant:
CAM CLEELAND, RODERICK COLEMAN, DONTA JONES and others
USA v. Michael Lewi
as 12-10781
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL LEWIS, also known as MD
New Orleans Saints, L.L.C. et al v. Cleeland et al
as 2:2011cv02093
Plaintiff:
New Orleans Saints, L.L.C. and National Football League Management Council
Defendant:
Cam Cleeland, Roderick Coleman, Donta Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Jeffrey Davis v. City of League City Texas, et al
as 10-41176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY J. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL LEWIS and KRISTEN MARIE DOWNS
Lewis v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association, et al
as 1:2010cv00565
Defendant:
HSBC Bank USA, National Association and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
John Michael Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Lewis v. Director TDCJ-CIO et al
as 6:2010cv00118
Plaintiff:
Henry Michael Lewis
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CIO, John A Rupert, Eddie D Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Thaler et al
as 6:2010cv00113
Plaintiff:
Henry Michael Lewis
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Evelyn D Green, John A Rupert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Thaler et al
as 4:2010cv00953
Plaintiff:
Henry Michael Lewis
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Evelyn D Green, John A Rupert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
