Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Maddox v. Ajanta Pharma USA Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv20349
Plaintiff:
Michael Maddox
Defendant:
Ajanta Pharma USA Inc., Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC, Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Mullis, Jr. v. Clark et al
as 8:2022cv01409
Plaintiff:
William Tony Mullis, Jr.
Defendant:
Clark, Carron, Klinect and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clarke v. Application Specialist Kompany, Inc et al
as 1:2021cv00404
Defendant:
Application Specialist Kompany, Inc doing business as JustAsk.Net, Amy Mumby, Justin Kikendall and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clarke v. Application Specialist Kompany, Inc et al
as 1:2021cv00405
Defendant:
Application Specialist Kompany, Inc, Amy Mumby, Michael Maddox and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Clarke
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Schantz v. Maddox
as 7:2019cv10206
Plaintiff:
Devin Schantz
Defendant:
Michael Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 mv
SCHANTZ v. MADDOX
as 5:2019cv02600
Plaintiff:
DEVIN SCHANTZ
Defendant:
MICHAEL MADDOX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maddox v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02716
Plaintiff:
Michael Maddox
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Williams et al
as 2:2016cv00895
Defendant:
Allen, Bogue, E. Castillo and others
Plaintiff:
Graham Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maddox v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01516
Plaintiff:
Michael Maddox
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
