Cases 41 - 50 of 190
Underwood v. Spencer, et al
as 20-1795
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SWEETS, f/k/a John Doe (Sweets), JACK HAUGHEY, MICHAEL GRANT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VALENTINE UNDERWOOD
MCDONALD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv67881
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCDONALD
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCDONALD v. FOUNTAIN
as 3:2020cv05665
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL MCDONALD, NOLAN SMITH, WILLIAM WILSON and others
Defendant:
GRAHAM FOUNTAIN and ERIC ESMOND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCDONALD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv45629
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCDONALD
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCDONALD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv36595
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
COREY J MICHAEL MCDONALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert McDonald v. Graham Fountain, et al
as 20-12112
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT MICHAEL MCDONALD
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC ESMOND, GRAHAM FOUNTAIN and OKALOOSA COUNTY JAIL
MCDONALD v. BISHOP et al
as 3:2020cv05482
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL MCDONALD
Defendant:
BILL BISHOP, MICHAEL A FLOWERS and ASHLEY MOODY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCDONALD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv00207
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCDONALD
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Weeks et al v. Matrix Absence Management Incorporated
as 2:2020cv00884
Defendant:
Matrix Absence Management Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Michael McDonald, Tina Weeks and Cassandra Magdaleno
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MCDONALD v. FOUNTAIN et al
as 3:2020cv05388
Defendant:
GRAHAM FOUNTAIN, OKALOOSA COUNTY JAIL and ERIC ESMOND
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL MCDONALD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
