Cases 11 - 20 of 57
Cohen v. Vandello et al
as 1:2009cv00736
Plaintiff:
Solomon Ben-Tov Cohen
Defendant:
James P. Vandello, Eric Holder and Michael Mukasey
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MILLER et al v. HEINEMAN et al
as 1:2009cv00578
Plaintiff:
CHARLES C. MILLER, HAROLD EDMUND STONIER and DALE SCOTT HEINEMAN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL MUKASEY, HARLEY LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Mukasey et al
as 4:2009cv00600
Plaintiff:
Paul Lee
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey, Sharon L. Potter and John Doe
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gomis v. Murry et al
as 5:2009cv00930
Plaintiff:
Antoine Gomis
Defendant:
Anthony S. Murry, Alberto R. Gonzales, Thomas Ward Hussey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LEE v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2009cv00385
Plaintiff:
PAUL LEE
Defendant:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, SHARON L. POTTER and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
HEINEMAN et al v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv00328
Plaintiff:
DALE SCOTT HEINEMAN and KIRK F. JOHNSON
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN, LINDA SANDERS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lyles v. Lemmon, et al
as 09-30105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE M LYLES
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY ANN V LEMMON, KAREN WELLS ROBY, PETER BEER and others
Eltayib v. Dewalt et al
as 5:2008cv00515
Plaintiff:
Abdel Eltayib
Defendant:
Stephen Dewalt, Harley Lappan, Kimberly White and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lyles v. Lemmons, et al
as 08-31208
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE M LYLES
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY ANN V LEMMON, KAREN WELLS ROBY, PETER BEER and others
Doye v. United States of America et al
as 1:2008cv03408
Plaintiff:
Irvin Sylvester Doye
Defendant:
United States of America, Office of Attorney General, Michael Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
