Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Wright v. YRC, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02851
Plaintiff:
Dariun Wright
Defendant:
YRC, Inc. and Michael Oliver
Not Classified By Court:
Jamita Swearengen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Hobart-Mayfield, Inc. v. NOCSAE, et al
as 21-1441
Defendant / Appellee:
RIDDELL, INC., VINCENT LONG, in his capacity as Engineering Manager of Schutt Sports, NATIONAL OPERATING COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS FOR ATHLETIC EQUIPMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOBART-MAYFIELD, INC., dba Mayfield Athletics
Oliver et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02923
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Angela P Oliver and Michael Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oliver v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2020cv12711
Plaintiff:
Michael Oliver
Defendant:
Donald Bussa, Detroit, City of and Stephen Cassini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hobart-Mayfield, Inc. v. National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment et al
as 2:2019cv12712
Defendant:
National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment, Kranos Corporation d/b/a Shutt Sports, Xenith, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Hobart-Mayfield, Inc. d/b/a Mayfield Athletics and Hobart-Mayfield, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Oliver v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 3:2016cv02062
Plaintiff:
Michael Oliver
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
United States of America v. Estate of Garland M. Oliver et al
as 4:2013cv00067
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Estate of Garland M. Oliver, Teresa M. Oliver, Christopher Michael Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Oliver v. Jackson Community College et al
as 2:2011cv11425
Defendant:
Jackson Community College , Jackson County Sheriff's Department , Ethan Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
