Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Michael Gorbey v. Geisinger Eye Center Owners & Rueters, et al
as 24-1590
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY, aka Michael Feather-Gorbey aka Michael Owl Feather Gorbey
Defendant:
GEISINGER EYE CENTER OWNERS & RUETERS, PATRICIA S. DODSZUWEIT, Clerk of Court U.S. App.Ct. 3rd Cir., J. OLSON, Ophthomology Doctor Geisinger Eye Center and others
Gorbey v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2022cv00554
Plaintiff:
Michael Owl Feather Gorbey
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Jeffry W. Parker, Rosemary V. Bourn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GORBEY v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL OWL FEATHER GORBEY
Defendant:
WILLIAMS, FORREN, CRAWFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GORBEY v WARDEN
as 1:2021cv01570
Respondent:
WARDEN OF USP-LEWISBURG
Petitioner:
MICHAEL OWL FEATHER GORBEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gorbey v. King et al
as 3:2021cv00016
Defendant:
A. King, Ian Connors, Gausetph and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Owl-Feather Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gorbey v. Geisinger Eye Center Owners & Rueters et al
as 3:2020cv02433
Defendant:
Edinger, D. Fassero, A. Duttry and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Owl-Feather Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael GorbeyIn re: Michael Gorbey
as 20-3483
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY, AKA Michael Feather-Gorbey, AKA Michael Owl Feather Gorbey
Respondent:
WARDEN LEWISBURG USP and ROBERT D. MARIANI
Gorbey v. Black et al
as 1:2020cv02011
Defendant:
Warden Spaulding, Captain Konkle, Unknown Name Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Owl-Feather Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gorbey v. Carney et al
as 1:2020cv01850
Defendant:
Brickland, B. Carney, Tanner and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Owl-Feather Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gorbey v. Spaulding et al
as 3:2020cv01457
Defendant:
United States and S. Spaulding
Plaintiff:
Michael Owl-Feather Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
