Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Michael R Jones v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv07142
Defendant: 3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff: Michael R Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv80033
Defendant: 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL R JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cage v. Nell et al
as 3:2020cv00485
Plaintiff: Quinton Cage
Defendant: Fred Warren Love, Michael R. Jones, Stephanie Stuart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2019cv06748
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Michael R Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cage v. Nell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00604
Plaintiff: Quinton Cage
Defendant: Collier W. Goodlett, Roger E. Nell and Michael R. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REINHOLD et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2015cv08580
Plaintiff: RICHARD J. REINHOLD , GLENN MILLER , JAMES CUFFE and others
Defendant: MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv08657
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jones v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2014cv00252
Plaintiff: Michael R. Jones
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Michael Jones v. OWCP
as 14-16875
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL R. JONES
Defendant - Appellee: DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAM
Michael Jones v. OWCP
as 14-16599
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL R. JONES
Defendant - Appellee: DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?