Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Reeves v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2022cv02757
Defendant:
3M Company, The, DuPont de Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Reeves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
REEVES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv23251
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL REEVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REEVES v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2021cv09073
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ESSEX, XYZ CORPORATION, ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL REEVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Passaro v. Commissioner of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00698
Defendant:
Hendy Fisch, Elmord Management, LLC, Mordechai Schwimmer and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Reeves and Matthew Tevis Passaro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reeves v. United States of America (USA)
as 20-4095
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Reeves
REEVE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv60490
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL REEVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01726
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
REEVES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv18414
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL REEVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REEVES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv84734
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL REEVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REEVES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv57980
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL REEVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
