Cases 1 - 10 of 16
v. MOSCATO et al
as 3:2024cv05720
Defendant:
ROBERT MOSCATO, LORI MOSCATO, SWOF VENTURES, LP. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
RODRIGUEZ v. MINNWHALE, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv20340
Defendant:
STAR GROUP LP, MINNWHALE, LLC and PETRO INC. doing business as PETRO HOME SERVICES
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01470
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
RODRIGUEZ v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv17022
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION and others
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Quezada v. Attorney General United State
as 17-2039
Petitioner:
MICHAEL QUEZADA, a/k/a Alexander Cruz a/k/a Michael Rodriguez
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DOE v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY et al
as 5:2016cv01007
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY and MICHAEL RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SMITH v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 3:2015cv07779
Plaintiff:
LEROY SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL RODRIGUEZ, BOROUGH OF LAKEHURST, NJ, LISA FISHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. Pierce et al
as 1:2014cv00019
Petitioner:
Michael Rodriguez
Respondent:
David Pierce and Joseph R. Biden, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez v. James T. Vaughn Correctional Center et al
as 1:2013cv01971
Petitioner:
Michael Rodriguez
Respondent:
James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, David Pierce and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Michael Rodriguez
as 13-3378
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL RODRIGUEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
