Cases 41 - 50 of 262
Ryan v. City of Oakland et al
as 4:2022cv00521
Plaintiff:
Timothy Michael Ryan
Defendant:
City of Oakland, Roland Holmgren and Patrick Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sean Ryan v. MI, et al
as 22-1048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAN MICHAEL RYAN
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORIZON HEALTHCARE, INC. and others
Carrillo v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2021cv05838
Plaintiff:
Michael Ryan Carrillo
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORETZ v. THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY et al
as 3:2021cv19822
Plaintiff:
LAURA K. MORETZ
Defendant:
THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON doing business as PRINCETON UNIVERSITY, MICHAEL RYAN, DEFENDANT DOE 1-10; and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TOUCHET v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv58783
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RYAN TOUCHET
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CREZEE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55271
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RYAN CREZEE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MIKESELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv52156
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RYAN MIKESELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oakley v. Dyer et al
as 2:2021cv00169
Plaintiff:
Randall Wayne Oakley
Defendant:
Amanda Dyer, Cassie Coppock, Tobie Bias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAILEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv39986
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RYAN DAILEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv28011
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RYAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
