Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Michael Gorbey v. Assistant Warden Crickard
as 24-6418
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey, a/k/a Michael S. Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
CRICKARD, FCI Estill S.C., COMMISSARY STAFF DUERK, FCI Estill S.C., COUNSELOR PLATTS, C-B; FCI Estill S.C. and others
In re: Michael Gorbey
as 24-1259
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Michael Owl Feather-Gorbey v. Warden
as 23-7155
Petitioner / Appellant:
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY, Monacan Nation Director of Project Authority
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, USP Thompson
OWLFEATHER-GORBEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02739
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-12961
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00324
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
OWLFEATHER-GORBEY v. REINHARD
as 1:2022cv03846
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant:
REINHARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Owl Feather-Gorbey v. Morris
as 22-7298
Plaintiff / Appellant:
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
MORRIS, Unit Counselor, SWAGGER, Commissary Supervisor, DOCTOR SADAT, FBOP Contract Doctor and others
Defendant:
PINE A LOWER EVENING UNIT LADY STAFF, PINE A COUNSELOR, POPLER B. LOWER COUNSELOR and others
Michael Gorbey v. Lt. Avery
as 22-7252
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT AVERY, LIEUTENANT SALCITO, WARDEN RATLEDGE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
