Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Smith v. Kelly
as 5:2022hc02146
Petitioner:
Stephen Michael Smith
Respondent:
Warden L. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SMITH v. FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00610
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SMITH and MICHAEL L. SMITH
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, ROCKY JOYNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00345
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ra
PRENTICE v. BOGGS et al
as 1:2015cv00311
Plaintiff:
STEVEN DIXON PRENTICE
Defendant:
LISA BLUE BOGGS and E. MICHAEL SMITH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PRENTICE V. BOGGS ET AL
as 1:2014cv01049
Plaintiff:
STEVEN D. PRENTICE
Defendant:
LISA BLUE BOGGS and MICHAEL SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Prentice v. Boggs et al
as 5:2014ct03285
Plaintiff:
Steven Prentice
Defendant:
Lisa Blue Boggs and Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Visser et al
as 5:2014ct03203
Plaintiff:
James Michael Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Celia Visser, Matt Lively, Gary E. Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, et al
as 1:2012cv00038
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, CITY OF CONCORD, NC , CABARRUS COUNTY and others
Movant:
NC DEPT. SECRETARY OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Smith v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 3:2011cv00612
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Smith
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, City of Concord, NC, Cabarrus County and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
SMITH v. PINION
as 1:2010cv00029
Petitioner:
KALVIN MICHAEL SMITH
Respondent:
TODD PINION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
