Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Tooley v. Werlich
as 3:2018cv00999
Petitioner:
Joseph Michael Tooley
Respondent:
Warden Werlich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tooley v. USA
as 5:2017cv06153
Respondent:
USA
Movant:
Joseph Michael Tooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Andrew Allen, et al v. USA, et al
as 17-17463
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW ALLEN, DONALD ALLEN, RICHARD ALLEN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SALLY JEWELL and AMY DUTSCHKE
Andrew Allen et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv04403
Plaintiff:
Andrew Allen , Donald Allen , Richard Allen and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Sally Jewell and Amy Dutschke
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Millmen Pension Fund et al v. Michael Tooley
as 1:2014cv04335
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Millmen Pension Fund , Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund and Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Apprentice & Trainee Program Fund
Defendant:
Michael Tooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Donald Allen, et al v. USA, et al
as 12-16573
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD ALLEN, BARBARA CRABTREE, LYNN CRABTREE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior
Allen et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv05069
Plaintiff:
Donald Allen , Barbara Crabtree , Venus Hoaglen and others
Defendant:
United States of America and Kenneth Salazar
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Allen et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2011cv05069
Plaintiff:
Donald Allen , Barbara Crabtree , Venus Hoaglen and others
Defendant:
United States of America and Kenneth Salazar
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Hardesty v. Barcus et al
as 9:2011cv00103
Plaintiff:
Marc Hardesty
Defendant:
Glen Barcus, Michael Tooley, Montana Highway Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
