Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Watts v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv01802
Plaintiff:
Michael Watts
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, J. Quick, C. Jourdan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watts v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv02318
Petitioner:
Michael Watts
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watts v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv01456
Plaintiff:
Michael Watts
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Superintendent Erin Reyes, Cpt. David Heehn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alcalacarrillo et al v. Peters et al
as 3:2022cv00487
Plaintiff:
Oscar Fermin Alcalacarrillo, Adam Steven Anderson, Donald Lee Anderson and others
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Sue Washburn, Paula Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watts v. Collier et al
as 4:2020cv03591
Defendant:
Warden Harrara, Dir TDCJ Brian Collier and Assistant Warden Wilder
Plaintiff:
Michael Watts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Abbott et al
as 4:2020cv02602
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Wilder, Warden Herrera, Greg Abbott and others
Plaintiff:
James H. Jackson, Michael Watts and Raymond Keith Odom, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Feaster v. Watts
as 3:2019cv00413
Defendant:
Michael Watts
Plaintiff:
Christopher Clevon Feaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATTS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv00274
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL WATTS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Michael Watts v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 18-10332
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL WATTS
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Watts v. Davis
as 3:2017cv02840
Petitioner:
Michael Watts
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
