Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Spigen, Inc. v. Cay Trading Inc., et al
as 8:2015cv00504
Defendant:
Cay Trading Inc, Does and Michael Weiss
Plaintiff:
Spigen, Inc.
Kihagi v. City of San Francisco
as 4:2015cv01168
Plaintiff:
Anna Kihagi , Xelan Prop 1, LLC , Renka Prop, LLC and others
Defendant:
City of San Francisco, California, Victoria L. Weatherford and Michael Weiss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Weiss v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2014cv01741
Plaintiff:
Alfred Michael Weiss
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bryan Shine v. Basil Merenda, et al
as 14-2080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN J. SHINE
Defendant - Appellee:
BASIL MERENDA, SHAWN D. KOFLUK, TIMOTHY REIDDEHL and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPH MCGETTIGAN
Weiss v. Injury Claim Group et al
as 1:2014cv00060
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive and Injury Claim Group
Plaintiff:
Michael Weiss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
JACKSON v. METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2013cv00205
Plaintiff:
DEON JACKSON
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, JOSHUA BOUTAUGH and MICHAEL WEISS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bryan Shine v. Basil Merenda, et al
as 12-4482
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN J. SHINE
Defendant - Appellee:
BASIL MERENDA, SHAWN D. KOFLUK, TIMOTHY REIDDEHL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05594
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
PETERSON v. WEISS et al
as 1:2012cv05431
Plaintiff:
NAN MOORE PETERSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL WEISS, THOMAS C. HAYNES, ESQ., JOHN GILETTE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MICHAEL WEISS v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION et al
as 1:2012cv01361
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WEISS
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
