Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Witt et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq03954
Plaintiff:
Michael Witt and Vonda Witt
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Chevron USA Inc. and others
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Paciorek v. Indiana Supreme Court et al
as 2:2021cv00237
Defendant:
G Michael Witte, Indiana Supreme Court, Michael Witte and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Paciorek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HIPPENSTEEL v. INDIANA SUPREME COURT et al
as 3:2018cv00185
Defendant:
INDIANA STATE POLICE, VANDERBURGH COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, SARAH BRINKLEY and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID HIPPENSTEEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03483
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Joseph David v. Marcus Nettles, et al
as 16-2388
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH DAVID
Defendant - Appellee:
MARCUS NETTLES, MICHAEL HARRIS, #6052, Illinois State Police Officer and MICHAEL WITT, Illinois State Poliec Lieutenant, #4829
FAUST v. MORRIS et al
as 1:2015cv01271
Defendant:
LISA BORGES, JANE DOE, MARIANNE FLEETWOOD and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH FAUST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. WITTE
as 1:2014cv01129
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LEWIS
Defendant:
G. MICHAEL WITTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. State of Indiana
as 3:2013cv00209
Plaintiff:
Gerald Clark
Defendant:
State of Indiana, Christopher P Shema, Mark E Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BATCHELOR v. DEARBORN COUNTY et al
as 1:2012cv01598
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA BATCHELOR
Defendant:
SALLY BLANKINSHIP, DEARBORN COUNTY, JOHN DORNETTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
