Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Grimes v. Hopkins County et al
as 4:2013cv00550
Plaintiff:
Willis Grimes
Defendant:
Hopkins County , Butch Adams , Corley Weatherford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Farina v. The City Of Rochester et al
as 6:2013cv06344
Plaintiff:
Samuel A. Farina
Defendant:
The City Of Rochester, Thomas S. Richards, James M. Sheppard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. Ameripath/Quest Diagnostics
as 3:2013cv00290
Plaintiff:
Michael Woods
Defendant:
Ameripath/Quest Diagnostics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hosea v. City of Bloomington et al
as 1:2012cv01489
Plaintiff:
Jason Douglas Hosea
Defendant:
City of Bloomington, City of Normal, McLean County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fullman v. Centre County Correctional Facility et al
as 4:2012cv02063
Plaintiff:
Isaac Kenneth Fullman
Defendant:
Centre County Correctional Facility, Jeffrey T Hite, Michael Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wood v. O'Neill et al
as 3:2012cv00751
Plaintiff:
Michael Wood
Defendant:
Robert O'Neill , Brent Zuscin and Christopher Kakalow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. City of Berwyn et al
as 1:2012cv01900
Plaintiff:
John Michael Woods
Defendant:
City of Berwyn and Ronald Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv07693
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Woods v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2009cv01201
Plaintiff:
Michael Woods, Jr., Michael Woods, Jr., Michael Woods, Jr. and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Joseph Tuman, Ricardo Mata and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
