Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Williams v. Revlon, Inc et al
as 1:2023cv11419
Plaintiff:
Michele Williams
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11336
Plaintiff:
Michelle Williams
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Croom v. Liles et al
as 1:2021cv01300
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Croom
Defendant:
J Liles, Andrew Smith, B Summer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05576
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Williams v. Saul
as 2:2020cv01112
Plaintiff:
Michelle Williams
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2019cv00081
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Nancy Michelle Williams
Not Yet Classified:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Williams v. Village of Riverdale et al
as 1:2019cv02781
Defendant:
Village of Riverdale, Other unknown/unidentified officers or officials, T. Jordan and others
Plaintiff:
Michele Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILLIAMS et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv01491
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN WAYNE WILLIAMS, II and DESIREE MICHELE WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dorsey v. Williams et al
as 1:2018cv05772
Defendant:
Lt. Jacobs, Sgt. Dethrow, Lt. Bishop and others
Plaintiff:
James Lee Dorsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
