Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Erickson v. Bisignano
as 4:2025cv01656
Plaintiff:
Michelle Erickson
Defendant:
Frank J. Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tamara Jones et al v. Whaleco, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv07406
Plaintiff:
Tamara Jones, Brandy Genet, David Pallas and others
Defendant:
Whaleco, Inc. doing business as Temu, PDD Holdings, Inc. doing business as Pinduodou Inc. and Does 1-100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Burnam et al v. Weld County Sheriffs, The et al
as 1:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
Eric Burnam, Erin Cienfuegos and Michelle Erickson
Defendant:
Weld County Sheriffs, The, Department of Human Services of Weld County, The, County Attorneys Office of Weld County, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ERICKSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv44594
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LINDA MICHELLE ERICKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Russell Wills, et al v. City of Dupont Police Departme, et al
as 19-35983
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELE ERICKSON and RUSSELL R. WILLS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DUPONT and CITY OF DUPONT POLICE DEPARTMENT
Horst et al v. Abused Adult Resource Center et al
as 1:2019cv00243
Plaintiff:
D.J.H., Charlotte Horst, S.J.H. and others
Defendant:
Catherine Lahtinen, Michelle Erickson, Abused Adult Resource Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wills et al v. City of Dupont Police Department et al
as 3:2019cv05795
Plaintiff:
Michele Erickson and Russell R Wills
Defendant:
City of Dupont Police Department and City of DuPont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Erickson v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2019cv00247
Plaintiff:
Michele Erickson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
