Cases 1 - 9 of 9
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21521
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL SANTIAGO THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SANTIAGO CUMMINGS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv11579
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE MIGUEL SANTIAGO CUMMINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chisholm et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03383
Plaintiff:
Anthony Espinosa, Renate Lawson, Jo Ann Smith and others
Defendant:
Buckeye Fire Equipment Co., Kidde PLC, Inc., Tyco Fire Products LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chisholm et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2018cv01152
Plaintiff:
Anthony Espinosa, Renate Lawson, Jo Ann Smith and others
Defendant:
Kidde PLC, Inc., Kidde Fire Fighting, Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t
Morales et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02804
Plaintiff:
Luz Rivera Morales and Miguel Santiago Bemos
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANTIAGO-TORRES v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. et al
as 5:2012cv06096
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL SANTIAGO-TORRES
Defendant:
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. , SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION and SEARS BRAND LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Soto v. Meadows Mills, Incorporated et al
as 3:2009cv00292
Plaintiff:
Miguel Santiago Soto and Miguel Santiago Soto
Defendant:
Meadows Mills, Incorporated and Miner Edger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Santiago v. Weiss
as 1:2008cv09250
Plaintiff:
Miguel Santiago
Defendant:
David Weiss
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Santiago v. Weiss
as 1:2008cv02517
Plaintiff:
Miguel Santiago
Defendant:
David Weiss
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
