Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Novoa v. Superintendent of SCI-Phoenix et al
as 3:2024cv00342
Petitioner:
Miguel Figueroa Novoa
Respondent:
Superintendent of SCI-Phoenix and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Figueroa v. USA
as 1:2022cv05419
Petitioner:
Miguel Figueroa
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
FIGUEROA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2018cv16026
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
MIGUEL FIGUEROA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Figueroa-Dominguez v. United States Of America Do not docket in this case. Docket entries should be made in 4:15-cr-570(01).
as 4:2017cv01166
Petitioner:
Luis Miguel Figueroa-Dominguez
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Figueroa v. USA
as 1:2016cv03556
Petitioner:
Miguel Figueroa
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Figueroa v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv00114
Petitioner:
Jose Miguel Figueroa
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Nathaniel Jackson v. Perry Phelps, et al
as 13-4468
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATHANIEL L. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellant:
PERRY PHELPS, MICHAEL TRADER, STEVEN FLOYD and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JESSE MARTIN
Allen et al v. Rednour et al
as 3:2013cv00851
Plaintiff:
Anthony Allen, Darren Henderson, Derrick Parks and others
Defendant:
David A Rednour, Richard Harrington, Shannis Stock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Figueroa v. Wright et al
as 9:2007cv01223
Plaintiff:
Miguel Figueroa
Defendant:
Lester Wright and Benjamin Darnobid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Figueroa-Rojas v. USA
as 5:2007cv00049
Petitioner:
Miguel Figueroa-Rojas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
