Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Witcher v. Maness, et al
as 1:2023cv01084
Plaintiff:
Kenijajuan Keon Witcher
Defendant:
Sheriff Leroy Martin, Jail Administrator Jerry Maness, Jailer Anita Cogbill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estate of Nathan Timothy Simon, et al v. Van Beek, et al
as 22-1426
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESTATE OF NATHAN TIMOTHY SIMON, by and through its personal representative Timothy Scott Simon, TIMOTHY SCOTT SIMON, indivdually and BERNADETTE MARY SIMON, individually
Defendant / Appellee:
EMT BERGON SHARP and CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE COMPANIES, LLC, DBA Correct Care Solutions, LLC, DBA Wellpath, LLC
Defendant:
SHERIFF JAMES VAN BEEK, in his official and individual capacities, CAPTAIN GREGORY VAN WYK, UNDERSHERIFF MIKE MCWILLIAMS, in his official and individual capacities and others
Estate of Nathan Timothy Simon, et al v. Van Beek, et al
as 22-1389
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ESTATE OF NATHAN TIMOTHY SIMON, by and through its personal representative Timothy Scott Simon, TIMOTHY SCOTT SIMON, indivdually and BERNADETTE MARY SIMON, individually
Defendant / Appellant:
SHERIFF JAMES VAN BEEK, in his official and individual capacities, CAPTAIN GREGORY VAN WYK, UNDERSHERIFF MIKE MCWILLIAMS, in his official and individual capacities and others
Defendant:
EMT BERGON SHARP, EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, EAGLE COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY and others
Broomfield v. Columbia County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2022cv01027
Plaintiff:
Kimberly A. Broomfield
Defendant:
Columbia County Sheriff's Department, Mike Loe, Jordan Hanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estate of Nathan Timothy Simon et al v. Van Beek et al
as 1:2021cv01923
Plaintiff:
Estate of Nathan Timothy Simon, Timothy Scott Simon and Bernadette Mary Simon
Defendant:
James Van Beek, James (I) Van Beek, Gregory Van Wyk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
