Cases 1 - 10 of 26
(PC) Morgan v. Carlisle et al
as 2:2026cv01727
Plaintiff:
Mike Morgan
Defendant:
Carlisle and Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Morgan v. Hall
as 2:2025cv02087
Plaintiff:
Mike Morgan
Defendant:
J. Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Morgan v. Hall
as 2:2024cv02395
Plaintiff:
Mike Morgan
Defendant:
J. Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Morgan v. Davies et al
as 2:2024cv01039
Plaintiff:
Mike Morgan
Defendant:
L. Davies, J. Hall and A. Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Morgan v. Davies et al
as 2:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Mike Morgan
Defendant:
L. Davies, J. Hall and A. Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Morgan v. Espinoza et al
as 2:2023cv01955
Plaintiff:
Mike Morgan
Defendant:
A. Espinoza, L. Davies and J. Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Morgan v. Macomber et al
as 2:2023cv01309
Plaintiff:
Mike Morgan
Defendant:
Jeffery Macomber, J. Hall, L. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tarawally v. Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2019cv00320
Defendant:
Hinds County, Mississippi, John and/or Jane Does 1-10, Mike Morgan and others
Plaintiff:
Sorie S. Tarawally
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mike Morgan Industrial LLC v. Trio Engineered Product Inc
as 2:2017cv01956
Plaintiff:
Mike Morgan Industrial LLC
Defendant:
Trio Engineered Product Inc and Trio Engineered Product Inc a/k/a Trio Engineered Products, Inc., d/b/a Weir Minerals Process Systems also d/b/a The Weir Group PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSENBAUM & ASSOCIATES, P.C. et al v. MORGAN & MORGAN et al
as 2:2017cv04250
Defendant:
MORGAN & MORGAN, MATT MORGAN, SCOTT WEINSTEIN and others
Plaintiff:
ROSENBAUM & ASSOCIATES, P.C., DAVID A. ROSENBAUM and JEFFREY M. ROSENBAUM
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
