Cases 11 - 20 of 73
Edward Abernathy v. Charles Heck, et al
as 23-1672
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD ABERNATHY
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES W. HECK, Correctional Officer, JAMES C. BELFORD, OBADIAH MIMS and others
MIMS v. ALICEA et al
as 1:2022cv01740
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND H. MIMS
Defendant:
A. ALICEA and S. WYATT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mims et al v. MacPyles Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv00631
Plaintiff:
Charles Mims and Madria Mims
Defendant:
MacPyles Corporation and Robert Pyles
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ferguson et al
as 1:2022cv01917
Plaintiff:
Terry Ferguson, Cherie Ferguson, Trace Ferguson and others
Defendant:
Chrisropher Labno, Christopher Stenzel, Bennie Mims and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MIMS v. ALGERSON
as 1:2022cv00576
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND MIMS
Defendant:
ALGERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2021pq01615
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Mims May
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Centre Insurance Company v. Mims et al
as 1:2021cv06065
Plaintiff:
Centre Insurance Company
Defendant:
Crystal Mims, Cortney Mim, Andrew Dewilde and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
MIMS et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv01706
Plaintiff:
MARTIS MIMS and WANDA MIMS
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS and COOK INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MIMS v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2021cv01169
Defendant:
LT OF GHU, HEAD OF MEDCAIL STAFF and DUSHAN ZATECKY
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND MIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims v. Zatecky et al
as 3:2021cv00281
Defendant:
Lt of GHU, Head of Medcail Staff and Dushan Zatecky
Plaintiff:
Raymond Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
