Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Keith Strom v. Douglas Mitchell, et al
as 22-35584
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH STROM
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUGLAS MITCHELL, Lane County Deputy District Attorney, KATHLEEN MILLER, Reedsport Justice Court and LINEBARGER, GOGGAN BLAIR & SAMPSON, Collections for Lane County Circuit Court
Poole v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2020cv02086
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Lane Poole
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lane v. Estate of Rayfield and Jean E. Lane et al
as 6:2020cv00145
Defendant:
Mitchell Lane, Melody Lane, Fla. Dept. of Corrections Secretary and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory R. Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wyatt v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2019cv00808
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Lane Wyatt
Defendant:
U S Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Culliton v. Vision Financial Corp.
as 2:2012cv00076
Defendant:
Vision Financial Corp.
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Lane Culliton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Culliton v. Vision Financial Corp.
as 2:2012at00028
Defendant:
Vision Financial Corp.
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Lane Culliton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Culliton v. Select Financial Services, Inc.
as 2:2011at01884
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Lane Culliton
Defendant:
Select Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Culliton v. Select Financial Services, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00002
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Lane Culliton
Defendant:
Select Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
