Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Allen Video Technology, Inc. v. Mitsubishi Electric US, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01644
Plaintiff: Allen Video Technology, Inc.
Defendant: Mitsubishi Electric US, Inc., Mitsubishi Electric Visual Solutions America, Inc. and Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Marlow Bates, Sr. v. Samsung Electronics America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-2355
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARLOW L. BATES, SR.
Defendant - Appellee: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INCORPORATED, SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC. and others
Dicam, Inc. v. NEC Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv00069
Plaintiff: Dicam, Inc., Dicam, Inc. and Dicam, Inc.
Defendant: NEC Corporation, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00026
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
HOLTKAMP v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2007cv00167
Plaintiff: LYNNE M. HOLTKAMP
Defendant: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Stern v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv00108
Plaintiff: Shawn Stern, Shawn Stern, Shawn Stern and others
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Loomis v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv00019
Plaintiff: David Loomis, David Loomis, David Loomis and others
Defendant: Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Fujitsu America, Inc., Fujitsu Limited, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Flanagan v. AU Optronics Corp., et al
as 3:2007cv00043
Plaintiff: Donna Jeanne Flanagan
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp, America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Martich v. AU Optronics Corp. America et al
as 5:2007cv00015
Plaintiff: John Martich and John Martich
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp. America, CHI MEI Optoelectronics Co., LTD., CHI MEI Optoelectronics USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?