Cases 1 - 10 of 104
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company of America et al v. Sheertrans Solutions, LLC
as 2:2024cv01513
Plaintiff:
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company of America and Sony Electronics, Inc.
Defendant:
Sheertrans Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Rheem Manufacturing Company et al v. Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company of America
as 1:2024cv01108
Plaintiff:
Rheem Manufacturing Company, Rheem Sales Company, Inc. and Industrias Rheem S.A. de C.V.
Defendant:
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Schleicher & Stebbins Hotels, LLC v. Everest Indemnity Insurance Company et al
as 1:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
Schleicher & Stebbins Hotels, LLC
Defendant:
Everest Indemnity Insurance Company, Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Certain Underwriters At Lloyds Of London Subscribing To Policy No. EW0040519 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Saltponds Condominium Association, Inc. v. Rockhill Insurance Company et al
as 4:2022cv10108
Plaintiff:
Saltponds Condominium Association, Inc.
Defendant:
Rockhill Insurance Company, Colony Insurance Company, First Specialty Insurance Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
7 Eleven Inc v. Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company of America
as 3:2022cv02706
Plaintiff:
7 Eleven Inc
Defendant:
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Arlen House Condominium Association, Inc. et al v. Rockhill Insurance Company et al
as 1:2022cv23649
Plaintiff:
Arlen House Condominium Association, Inc. and Arlen House West Condominium Association, Inc.
Defendant:
Rockhill Insurance Company, ROCKHILL INSURANCE COMPANY SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY RCPPRU000025-00, COLONY INSURANCE COMPANY SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY XP263866 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Arlen House Condominium Association, Inc. v. Arlen House West Condominium Association, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv23647
Plaintiff:
Arlen House Condominium Association, Inc.
Defendant:
Arlen House West Condominium Association, Inc., Rockhill Insurance Company, Colony Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company Of America, et al v. M/V One Apus, et al
as 1:2022cv08233
Plaintiff:
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company Of America,, Affliated FM Insurance Company, Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty and others
Defendant:
One, BDP Transport Inc., HMM and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Danmar Lines
Cross Claimant:
Transpac Cargoline, New Chain Logistics Co Ltd, Samsung SDS Co Ltd and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
M/V ONE APUS, IMO no. 9806079, including its engines, boilers, tackle, and other appurtenances, etc., in rem
Cross Defendant:
Roes 1-10
3Rd Party Defendant:
Orient Overseas Container Line, M/V One Apus in rem, ECU Worldwide and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30701 Marine Cargo Loss or Damage - Liability of Water Carriers
Lake Charles Storage L L C v. Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co of America et al
as 2:2021cv03079
Plaintiff:
Lake Charles Storage, LLC and Lake Charles Storage L L C
Defendant:
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company of America, Deans & Homer, Insurance Managing Underwriters, Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co of America and others
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
General Star Indemnity Company et al v. JRK Property Holdings, Inc.
as 2:2021cv05287
Defendant:
JRK Property Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lloyds Underwriter Syndicate No. 1886 subscribing to Policy No. (UMR) B01PG1902610, Endurance Worldwide Insurance Ltd., LIRMA E9105 subscribing to Policy No. (UMR) B0180PG1902611, Lloyds Underwriter Syndicate AFB 2623 subscribing to Policy No. (UMR) B0180PG1902606 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
