Cases 1 - 10 of 29
MITTS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv07783
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MITTS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MITTS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv45798
Plaintiff:
JULIA N MITTS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MITTE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv96602
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW MITTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Isaac v. United States of America et al
as 5:2018cv00187
Plaintiff:
Wendell D. Isaac
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, J. Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Green v. West-Ward Pharmaceuticals Corp et al
as 7:2018cv00462
Plaintiff:
Norman Christopher Green
Defendant:
West-Ward Pharmaceuticals Corp , Alabama CVS Pharmacy LLC , Par Pharmaceutical Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MCLIN v. MILLER et al
as 3:2017cv00488
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STARR MCLIN
Defendant:
JOHN L MILLER, NASH, LLOYD OVERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Smith Chapel Bible University et al
as 9:2017cv80347
Plaintiff:
Randal A. Ferguson
Defendant:
Smith Chapel Bible University, Prevail Outreach Ministries, Abe Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv61299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 7:2015cv00096
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
