Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
LOGUE v. WALMART et al
as 1:2026cv07151
Plaintiff:
THERESA LOGUE
Defendant:
WALMART, JOHN DOE(S) (1-10) OWNERS, JOHN MOE(S) (1-10) MANAGEMENT COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Alzeyadi et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2026cv05022
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Ali Alzeyadi and Moe Deli Grill Corp. # N/A
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 202
Martin v. Wright Allen et al
as 1:2026cv03493
Plaintiff:
Tanesha Martin
Defendant:
Arenda L Wright Allen, Anne-Leigh Gaylord Moe and Leslie Hoffman Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Ayers (Kennedy)
as 26-1531
Defendant:
DERRICK AYERS, BERMON CLARKE, NIA GOVAN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv02796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
United States of America v. Ayers (Harrell)
as 26-1478
Defendant:
DERRICK AYERS, BERMON CLARKE, NIA GOVAN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Buccie Cline, III v. The Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack LLC, et al
as 26-11809
Plaintiff:
BUCCIE CLINE, III
Defendant:
THE PEP BOYS MANNY MOE & JACK LLC and SHERIFF OF ESCAMBIA COUNTY FLORIDA
United States of America v. Ayers (Wright)
as 26-1420
Defendant:
DERRICK AYERS, BERMON CLARKE, NIA GOVAN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Martin v. Wright Allen et al
as 6:2026cv01100
Plaintiff:
Tanesha Martin
Defendant:
Arenda L Wright Allen, Anne-Leigh Gaylord Moe and Leslie Hoffman Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
