Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Mohammad Sharifi v. Warden Holman CF
as 24-11280
Petitioner: MOHAMMAD SHARIFI
Respondent: HOLMAN CF WARDEN
Mohammad Sharifi v. Warden Holman CF
as 24-11025
Petitioner: MOHAMMAD SHARIFI
Respondent: HOLMAN CF WARDEN
Mohammad Sharifi v. District Attorney of Madison County
as 23-12396
Plaintiff / Appellant: MOHAMMAD SHARIFI
Defendant / Appellee: ROBERT BROUSSARD, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, FOR MADISON COUNTY and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR MADISON COUNTY
Sharifi v. Broussard We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00661
Plaintiff: Mohammad Sharifi
Defendant: Robert Broussard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharifi v. Broussard We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00157
Plaintiff: Mohammad Sharifi
Defendant: Esq. Robert Broussard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01244
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Sharifi v. Broussard We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00148
Plaintiff: Mohammad Sharifi
Defendant: Esq. Robert Broussard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mohammad SharifiIn re: Mohammad Sharifi
as 23-10618
Petitioner: In re: MOHAMMAD SHARIFI
Respondent: COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR MADISON COUNTY
Sharifi v. Hamm et al
as 5:2022cv01379
Plaintiff: Mohammad Sharifi
Defendant: John Hamm, Hon. Steve Marshall, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharifi v. Hamm et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00826
Plaintiff: Mohammad Sharifi
Defendant: John Hamm, Hon. Steve Marshall, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?