Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 68
David Jose Dong Ryu v. Fashiongo Korea et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00691
Defendant: Fashiongo Korea, Naver, Fashiongo a U.S. form unknown doing business as Fashiongo.net and others
Plaintiff: David Jose Dong Ryu, David Jose Ryu and Dong Ryel Ryu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv05271
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Threats v. Beard We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv02284
Plaintiff: Derlyn Ray Threats
Defendant: Jeffrey Beard, Michael D. Stainer, Martin Hosnino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mok v. Rucker et al
as 0:2015cv01570
Plaintiff: Kinkeung Mok
Defendant: Robert A. Rucker , Peter J. Jacullo, III, Peter H. Kamin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mok v. 21 Mott St. Restaurant Corp. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv08081
Plaintiff: William Mok
Defendant: 21 Mott St. Restaurant Corp. , Peter Lee and Philip Lee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-16753
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01231
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014at00642
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edward Ok v. USA
as 14-55407
Petitioner - Appellant: EDWARD SEUNG OK, AKA Ed Ok, AKA Seung Mok Ok
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00897
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?