Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MONEY v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00988
Plaintiff:
ALISHIA MARIE MONEY
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
McGown v. Cantina Louie of Asheville, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
Lisa McGown
Defendant:
Cantina Louie of Asheville, LLC, Beer Money Ventures, LLC doing business as The Casual Pint and Pacific Pagoda, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Money v. King
as 5:2022hc02132
Petitioner:
Chad Houston Money
Respondent:
Warden M.L. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
The Money Source, Inc. v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
The Money Source, Inc.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Torts to Land
Money v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2021cv00141
Plaintiff:
Alishia Marie Money
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DAVIS v. STADION MONEY MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00119
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and STADION MONEY MANAGEMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
TUCKER v. KIVETT et al
as 1:2018cv00897
Defendant:
SHERIFF SCHATZMAN, CPL. KIVETT, CAPT. GUARD SETTLE and others
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLADDEN v. MONEY
as 1:2018cv00038
Plaintiff:
TYRONE DONTE GLADDEN
Defendant:
CORPERAL MONEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. $6,000.00 in Western Union Money Orders, et al
as 5:2017cv00181
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$6,000.00 in Western Union Money Orders, MONEY GRAM MONEY ORDER, $15,700.00 IN WESTERN UNION MONEY ORDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
