Cases 41 - 50 of 73
J. et al v. Smith et al
as 8:2016cv03302
Plaintiff:
A. J. , J.J. and H.J.
Defendant:
Jack R. Smith and Montgomery County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
M.L. et al v. Smith et al
as 8:2016cv03236
Plaintiff:
W. L. , C. L. and M. L.
Defendant:
Jack R. Smith and Montgomery County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
J.R. et al v. Bowers et al
as 8:2016cv01633
Plaintiff:
N.R. , B.R. and J. R.
Defendant:
Larry Bowers and Montgomery County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1260
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
M. L. v. Joshua Starr
as 15-1977
Plaintiff - Appellant:
M. L., a minor, by his parents and next friends, Akiva and Shani Leiman, AKIVA LEIMAN and SHANI LEIMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSHUA P. STARR, (officially as), Superintendent and MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-2105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
F.C., et al v. Montgomery County Public Schools, et al.
as 8:2014cv02562
Defendant:
Montgomery County Public Schools, Montgomery County Board of Education and Joshua Starr
Plaintiff:
F. C. , E. C. and J. C.
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
M.L., et al. v. Starr et al
as 8:2014cv01679
Plaintiff:
M. L. , Akiva Leiman and Shani Leiman
Defendant:
Joshua P. Starr and Montgomery County Board of Education/Montgomery County Public School
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.