Cases 1 - 10 of 286
Travis v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Monty Theodore Travis
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Travis v. Ford Motor Co
as 6:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Monty Theodore Travis
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Ford Motor Co
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Grigsby, et al.
as 24-628
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant:
AARON GRIGSBY
Defendant:
MATTHEW WADE BEASLEY, BEASLEY LAW GROUP, PC, JEFFREY J. JUDD and others
Receiver:
GEOFF WINKLER, Receiver for J&J Consulting Services, Inc., J&J Consulting Services, Inc., J and J Purchasing LLC, The Judd Irrevocable Trust, and BJ Holdings LLC
Jansen v. Cobb, et al.
as 24-543
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AUSTIN JANSEN
Defendant / Appellee:
MONTY COBB, Superior Court Judge and MASON COUNTY
USA v. Trotter
as 24-40049
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Darell Montrell Trotter, also known as Monty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Thlopthlocco Tribal Town v. Wiley, et al
as 24-5011
Plaintiff:
THLOPTHLOCCO TRIBAL TOWN, a federally recognized Indian Tribe
Defendant:
ROGER WILEY, RICHARD C. LERBLANCE, AMOS MCNAC and others
Adam et al v. The 3M Company et al
as NYS/1:24-CV-00358
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Adam, Lisa Butz, Chane Canfield and others
March v. Real Estate Board of New York et al
as NYS/1:23-CV-09995
Plaintiff:
March and Monty March
Defendant:
Real Estate Board of New York, Real Estate Board of New York Listing Service, Brown Harris Stevens LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
