Cases 11 - 20 of 25
JOHNSON v. I.R.S. et al
as 1:2015cv01311
Petitioner:
HERBERT JOHNSON
Respondent:
I.R.S. , L. FOWLER, DEIDRE MORRON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BRYK et al v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2014cv07327
Plaintiff:
RANDY BRYK and ROBERT MORRONE
Defendant:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent Thomas v. Thomas McGarrigle
as 14-3920
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. MCGARRIGLE, Chairman, MARIO CIVERA, JR., Chairman-Vice, COLLEEN P. MORRONE, Board Member and others
MORRONE et al v. SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2014cv05090
Plaintiff:
DENISE MORRONE , GERARD SCHEL and MICHAEL BELFIORE
Defendant:
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
THOMAS v. MCGARRIGLE et al
as 2:2014cv04757
Plaintiff:
VINCENT THOMAS
Defendant:
TOM MCGARRIGLE, MARIO J. CIVERA, JR., COLLEEN P. MORRONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON et al
as 5:2014cv02405
Plaintiff:
MANUEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON, WARDEN, TORRES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MORRONE et al v. SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2013cv07596
Plaintiff:
JACK MORRONE , GERARD SCHEL and MICHAEL BELFIORE
Defendant:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053
MORRONE et al v. SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2013cv07595
Plaintiff:
JACK MORRONE , GERARD SCHEL and MICHAEL BELFIORE
Defendant:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
