Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Moss v. McClain
as 5:2024cv00584
Petitioner:
Scotty Dale Moss
Respondent:
Warden Antonio McClain and Attorney General State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moss v. McClain et al
as 5:2023cv01600
Petitioner:
Scotty Dale Moss
Respondent:
Antonio McClain and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Attia v. Pascagoula Police, et al
as 1:2023cv00342
Defendant:
Steve Harvard, Randy Neil, Pascagoula Police and others
Plaintiff:
Joel B. Attia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Giddens v. Pressley et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Antonio Giddens
Defendant:
Desmond Pressley, Officer Barnes and Sgt. Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. Birmingham Jefferson County Transit Authority
as 2:2022cv01298
Plaintiff:
Mark Moss
Defendant:
Birmingham Jefferson County Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Merida et al v. Olin Corporation
as 1:2022cv00358
Plaintiff:
Idris Merida, Charles Koger, Bennie Henderson and others
Defendant:
Olin Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Wilson v. Hasty et al
as 7:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Lavarice Wilson
Defendant:
Denise Hasty, David Lance Bailey, Brantley A. Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. Cutts et al
as 7:2021cv01468
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lamar Moss
Defendant:
Andrew Cutts and T. Miree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00670
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Moss v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 3:2021cv01241
Plaintiff:
Rita Moss
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
