Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Brock v. Belt et al
as 5:2016cv00144
Plaintiff:
Dominique J. Brock
Defendant:
Troy Belt, Rodger Mitchell, Bruce Von Dwingelo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony DeNoma v. John Kasich, et al
as 16-3839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY DENOMA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN R. KASICH, TED STRICKLAND, GARY C. MOHR, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC) and others
Thomas #476165 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv00691
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Thomas #476165
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Unknown Burke, Unknown Traylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeNoma v. Kasich et al
as 1:2015cv00594
Plaintiff:
Anthony DeNoma
Defendant:
John R. Kasich, Ted Strickland, Gary Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moyer #647263 v. Harry
as 1:2014cv00023
Petitioner:
Richard Eugene Moyer #647263, Jr.
Respondent:
Shirlee Harry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Payne et al v. Pummill et al
as 2:2013cv01172
Plaintiff:
Lowell N. Payne, Clifford L. Rucker, James Robinson and others
Defendant:
Cathy Pummill, Jane Doe Park, Amy Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cary #269436 v. Robinson et al
as 1:2013cv00431
Plaintiff:
Bryan Allen Cary #269436
Defendant:
M. Robinson, B. Youngs, A. Smolinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Moyer et al
as 3:2013cv00123
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Harris
Defendant:
(f/n/u) Moyer and John Adkerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Metro-Nashville Tennessee Police Department et al
as 3:2013cv00122
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Harris
Defendant:
Metro-Nashville Tennessee Police Department, John Adkerson, William Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patrick v. Moyers et al
as 3:2011cv00064
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Patrick
Defendant:
William T. Moyers and Deana Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
