Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Bernard v. Thomas et al
as 5:2017ct03266
Plaintiff:
Farley L. Bernard
Defendant:
Eddie Thomas, Mr. Monroe, Jimmy D. Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Daniels et al
as 5:2017ct03222
Plaintiff:
Quincy Jackson
Defendant:
D. Daniels, S. Fonville, Mr. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Gregory, Jr. v. Dr. L. Levin
as 17-6407
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM JAMES GREGORY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. L. LEVIN, Doctor, Haynesville Correctional Center and ISRAEL HAMILTON, Warden
Defendant:
CHARLES ALLEN, Warden, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, DAVID ROBINSON and others
Ali v. Smith et al
as 2:2017cv00052
Plaintiff:
Elijah Shakur Ali
Defendant:
Mr. Smith and Mr. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Smith et al
as 1:2016cv01232
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sanchez
Defendant:
Mr. Smith, Mr. Jones, Ms. Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Rivera v. Bryan Stirling
as 16-7072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH SYNCERE RIVERA, a/k/a Kenneth D. Rivera, a/k/a Kenneth Rivera
Defendant - Appellee:
BRYAN STIRLING, Director, JOSEPH MCFADDEN, Warden, RYSHEMA DAVIS, Nutritionist IV and others
Brown v. Jones et al
as 0:2014cv02227
Plaintiff:
Samuel Brown, Jr
Defendant:
Mr Jones, Charleston County Solicitors Office, Charleston County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrence Tate v. Billy Martin
as 14-6508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRENCE EDMOND TATE
Defendant - Appellee:
BILLY MARTIN, Head of Medical, J. KELLY, Tillery Unit Manager and JOHN DOE
Defendant:
MR. JONES, Physician, MR. JONES, SAMI HASAN and others
Terrance Palmer v. Wendall Pixley
as 14-6199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRANCE S. PALMER
Defendant - Appellee:
WENDALL PIXLEY, Warden, MR. LOVETT, Captain/Watch Commander, SPEIGHTS, Safety Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv00005
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
