Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bludgeon Riffola Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv06905
Plaintiff:
Bludgeon Riffola Ltd.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, MIGAZURE Official Store, 544925066 Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Iske v. H.D.S.P. et al
as 2:2022cv01035
Plaintiff:
Harlan Iske
Defendant:
H.D.S.P., H.D.S.P. Medical Staff, Sonya Corriton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Benton et al
as 4:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Ernest Howard King
Defendant:
Warden Brooks L. Benton, Deputy Warden Jones, Sgt. Michell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maatsch v. Centurion of Florida, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv24998
Defendant:
Dr. F. Papillion, Dr. Dean Aufderheide, Mr. Love and others
Plaintiff:
John Maatsch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Swisher et al
as 3:2020cv00533
Defendant:
Mr. Dudek, A. Williams, Mr. Wannack and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonnett v. Hardison et al
as 5:2019ct03338
Defendant:
Johnny Hawkins, Mrs. Love, Mrs. Hardison and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Derrick Bonnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abernathy v. Heinfer et al
as 3:2019cv01207
Defendant:
C/O Payne, C/O Maddox, Lt. Kamos and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Abernathy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Boston Center for Addictive Behaviors et al
as 1:2018cv11236
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jones
Defendant:
Boston Center for Addictive Behaviors, Mr Love and Oswald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Vienna Correctional Center et al
as 3:2013cv00945
Plaintiff:
Samuel R Taylor
Defendant:
Vienna Correctional Center, Randy Davis, Mr Love and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
