Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Charles Gamble v. Warden Kenneth Nelson
as 23-6222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES GAMBLE, a/k/a Charles Edward Gamble, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNETH NELSON, TONYA JAMES, HENDRIX and others
Defendant:
MR. MOORE, MS. SMITH, MR. ROBINSON and others
Gamble v. Nelson et al
as 4:2022cv02341
Plaintiff:
Charles Gamble and Charles Edward Gamble, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Kenneth Nelson, Warden Tonya James, Mr. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Banner v. Anderson et al
as 6:2021cv03738
Plaintiff:
Genuine Truth Banner
Defendant:
Joel Anderson, Joseph Stines, Dennis Patterson, Sr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeal v. Hutchinson et al
as 2:2021cv03431
Plaintiff:
Timothy McNeal
Defendant:
Ms. J. Hutchinson, Mr. C. Nevils, Mr. Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steppello v. John Doe Captain et al
as 5:2020ct03238
Plaintiff:
Dean Steppello
Defendant:
John Doe Warden, Mr. Moore, Lt. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chappell v. United States Government et al
as 9:2020cv00316
Defendant:
Asst. Warden Modier, CSO Mr. Moore, CSO A. Coles and others
Plaintiff:
William Chappell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Butler et al
as 5:2018ct03367
Defendant:
Mrs. Drayton, Mr. Lucus, Ms. Baily-Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Butler et al
as 5:2018ct03365
Defendant:
Director of Inmate Housing, Mr. Moore, Mr. Butler and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Butler et al
as 5:2018ct03352
Defendant:
Mrs. Drayton, Mr. Moore, Ms. Springer and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Asbell et al
as 5:2018ct03236
Defendant:
Kenneth Lassiter, Eric A. Hooks, Thomas Asbell and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
