Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Royal v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2022cv00506
Plaintiff:
Jarice L. Royal
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison, Red Onion State Prison, River North Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2022cv00489
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah D. Scott
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison, Red Onion State Prison, River North Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardy v. Wallens Ridge et al
as 7:2022cv00461
Plaintiff:
Vincent A. Hardy, Jr.
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge, Red Onion, River North and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faison v. G.K. Fountain Atmore, AL et al
as 1:2021cv00035
Defendant:
Mrs. Simmons, Ms. Adams, G.K. Fountain Atmore, AL and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney P. Faison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green, Damien v. Adams et al
as 3:2019cv00690
Defendant:
Dr., S. Martin, Ms. Adams and others
Not Yet Classified:
WSPF Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Damien Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herd v. Daniel et al
as 4:2019cv00263
Defendant:
Anne Daniel, K Johnson, C Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Byron Craig Herd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Shreveport et al
as 5:2019cv00357
Defendant:
Ms Anderson, Ms Brown, Police Chief City of Shreveport and others
Plaintiff:
Stacey Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Hayden et al
as 4:2017cv00088
Plaintiff:
Tobias Antwane Hayden
Defendant:
G. Bradley, Ms. Adams, Kevin Sprayberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayden v. Bradley et al
as 4:2017cv00078
Plaintiff:
Tobias Antwane Hayden
Defendant:
G. Bradley, Ms. Adams, Kevin Sprayberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adrian Bacon v. Randall Mathena
as 15-6192
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIAN NATHANIEL BACON
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN RANDALL MATHENA, S. FLETCHER, T. HUFF and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
