Cases 1 - 10 of 13
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company v. Patrice D. Mudd et al
as 8:2020cv01271
Defendant:
Lisa T. Mudd-Losness, Becky R. Mudd-Bell, Matthew W. Mudd and others
Plaintiff:
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mackey v. People of the State of California et al
as 3:2020cv00931
Defendant:
People of the State of California, Amala L. Meza, Jeffrey F. Fraser and others
Plaintiff:
David Ernesto Mackey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Chambers v. Knight et al
as 3:2018cv02906
Defendant:
John A. Knight, Colin Lucas-Mudd and Aitekz PLC
Plaintiff:
Jody F. Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gordon v. Mudd et al
as 3:2018cv00376
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Gordon
Defendant:
Mudd, Tri City Medical Center and Erin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Brian Mudd et al v. Clear Recon Corp. et al
as 2:2017cv05650
Defendant:
Clear Recon Corp., Does and Wells fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Brian Mudd and Julie Mudd
Elizabeth DeMichiel v. AEG Live NJ, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00913
Defendant:
ABC Corporation, ABC Corporation, AEG Live NJ LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth DeMichiel
Elizabeth DeMichiel v. AEG Live NJ, LLC et al
as 2:2016mc00009
Defendant:
ABC Corporation, ABC Corporation, AEG Live NJ LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth DeMichiel
Elizabeth DeMichiel v. AEG Live NJ, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00529
Defendant:
ABC Corporation, ABC Corporation, AEG Live NJ LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth DeMichiel
Elofson v. Bivens et al
as 5:2015cv05761
Plaintiff:
Greg Elofson
Defendant:
Stephanie Bivens, Stephanie Mccollum, Lawrence Scaringelli and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Greg Elofson v. Stephanie Bivens et al
as 2:2015cv06332
Plaintiff:
Greg Steven Elofson
Defendant:
Stephanie Bivens, Kerstin Lemaire, Stephanie McCollum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
