Cases 1 - 10 of 768
Hundal v. Islas, et al.
as 24-2303
Plaintiff:
GURKIRN HUNDAL
Defendant:
RUBEN ISLAS, JR., MARTHA ISLAS ENRIQUEZ, JOE ZUNIGA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024at00443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
(PS) Malik et al v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co., et al
as 2:2024cv01093
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Younas Malik and Nazia Jabeen Iqbal
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Nationwide Insurance Company of America, AMCO Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Joe A. Taylor-El et al v. Leanna Lundy et al
as 2:2024cv02611
Plaintiff:
Joe A. Taylor-El and Darrick L. Jones-Bey
Defendant:
Leanna Lundy, Erica Lake, J. McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khan v. Stricklin, et al.
as 24-1446
Plaintiff:
MUHAMMAD KHAN
Defendant:
ROBIN STRICKLIN, SEAN TUMACDER, LORENA GOMEZ and others
Husayn v. Mitchell, et al.
as 24-1468
Plaintiff:
ZAYN AL-ABIDIN MUHAMMAD HUSAYN, also known as Abu Zubaydah
Defendant:
JAMES MITCHELL and JOHN JESSEN, also known as Bruce Jessen
(PC) Ramirez v. Campbell, et al.
as 1:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Saul Miranda Ramirez
Defendant:
Tammy Campbell, E. McDaniel, Mehta Anand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Umar v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Muhammad M Umar
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, Rowe Enterprises Incorporated and Precision Toyota of Tucson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas, Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01719
Defendant:
Doe 16, Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
