Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Muhammad v. Vandergriff
as 4:2023cv00905
Petitioner:
Omar Muhammad
Respondent:
David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Muhammad v. Home Solutions Group of Southern CA, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv01255
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Muhammad
Defendant:
Home Solutions Group of Southern CA, LLC, Tara Meinke and Kevin Meinke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
American Family Mutual Insurance Company S.I. v. Britton et al
as 4:2021cv01105
Plaintiff:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company S.I.
Defendant:
Randall Britton, Rahmann Muhammad and Raheem Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Muhammad v. Charter Communications LLC
as 4:2021cv00614
Plaintiff:
Kamelah Muhammad
Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Muhammad v. Menard, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00352
Defendant:
Menard, Inc. d/b/a Menards and Menard, Inc. doing business as Menards
Plaintiff:
Barbara Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
A.P. et al v. City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2020cv01547
Defendant:
Pamela Clark, Andrew Vanderusen, Amber Bass and others
Plaintiff:
Angie Pollock, A.P., G.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv06140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
