Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Moore v. Tom's Plumbing, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moore
Defendant:
Tom's Plumbing, Inc. doing business as Mullen Plumbing, Heating and Cooling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Saunders v. Mullens et al
as 1:2023cv00686
Plaintiff:
Gregory Saunders
Defendant:
James E. Mullens, Ofc. D. M. Pertee, Ofc. Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woody v. Southern Regional Jail and Correctional Center et al
as 5:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Percy Ryshawn Woody
Defendant:
Southern Regional Jail and Correctional Center, Fleshman, Merithith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calvario et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv10794
Plaintiff:
Carmen Calvario , Connie Neeley , Shirley Wittman and others
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Doe Manufacturers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Berryman v. Mullen et al
as 1:2016cv00047
Defendant:
Mullen, John Doe I, John Doe II and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Berryman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Osborne v. U. S. Attorney et al
as 2:2015cv15341
Plaintiff:
Ajamu Osborne
Defendant:
U. S. Attorney, Monica Coleman, M-DENT CEO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mullen v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv28052
Plaintiff:
Peggy Mullen
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mullen et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv26961
Plaintiff:
Deborah Mullen and Jimmy Mullen
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. O'Brien et al
as 2:2014cv00030
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Wilson
Defendant:
Terry O'Brien, John Doe, J. Gully and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mullen et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv13444
Plaintiff:
Linda M. Mullen and George Mullen
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
