Cases 1 - 10 of 110
Mulvihill v. Select Health of South Carolina, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Mulvihill
Defendant:
Select Health of South Carolina, Inc. d/b/a First Choice Next, a South Carolina coporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
MULVIHILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv02934
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JAMES MULVIHILL, II
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mulvihill v. Charter Communications Inc et al
as 6:2023cv03542
Plaintiff:
Judy F Mulvihill
Defendant:
Charter Communications Inc doing business as Spectrum and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
MULVIHILL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18619
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MATTHEW MULVIHILL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
75 Printers Parkway Partners, LLC et al v. Papalini et al
as 6:2022cv00708
Plaintiff:
75 Printers Parkway Partners, LLC, Summit Primary and Pain, LLC, Summit Primary Care, PLLC and others
Defendant:
Eric Papalini, Joseph P. Mulvihill, 75 Printers Parkway Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Robert, et al v. Austin, et al
as 22-1032
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAN ROBERT, SSGT, U.S. Army and HOLLIE MULVIHILL, SSGT, USMC and other similarly situated individuals
Defendant / Appellee:
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense, U.S. Department of Defense, XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and JANET WOODCOCK, in her official capacity as Acting Commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Robert et al v. Austin et al
as 1:2021cv02228
Plaintiff:
Dan Robert and Hollie Mulvihill
Defendant:
Lloyd Austin, Xavier Becerra and Janet Woodcock
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1107 Armed Forces: Use Of Investigational New Drug
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00764
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
(PS) Liang et al v. Stockton Police Dept., et al
as 2:2021cv00661
Plaintiff:
Kuanghuei Liang, Wen Sun and Lijun Zhang
Defendant:
Lee, Moine, Urie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
